Many people spend time choosing an efficient monitor to make sure that it’ll be able to display all the colors and resolution it needs. Nevertheless, this is most required during gaming or designing. In this product review, we will evaluate two of the most purchased gaming monitors.
ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q and Acer Predator X34 are two of the most in-demand gaming monitors, especially for gamers.
Thus, with a slight difference in price, similar built and quality, it’s really difficult to judge which is better than another.
Asus ROG Swift PG348Q vs Acer Predator X34
| Asus ROG Swift PG348Q | Acer Predator X34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 34 inches | 34 inches |
| Refresh Rate | 100 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Response Time | 5ms | 4ms |
| Resolution | 3440 x 1440p | 3440 x 1440p |
| Speakers | 2-watt speakers, Two | 7-watt speakers, Two |
| Ports | 1 x Display Port and 1 x HDMI 1.4 Port | 1 x Display Port and 1 x HDMI 1.4 Port |
| Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 21:9 |
| Availability | Check Current Pricing | Check Current Pricing |
[aawp box=”B07VTTZ4TD” ]
[aawp box=”B079FV8S5M” ]
Specs and Features
Manufactured both in Taiwan from different companies, there has been a lot of comparison with these two devices. Both were introduced in 2016 with Acer only one to three months earlier than ASUS, it is a somehow difficult one from the other with a lot of similarities.
Thus, in this part of this article, we will dig into the specs and features of these two monitors as needed.
Resolution and Display
The wideness, clarity of colors, and the number of pixels on the screen determine the resolution. Looking at both devices, it is quite clear that they are very similar indeed. They have astounding resolution (3440x 1440) and size of about 34 inches. Both also incorporate a 100% RGB identity for full-color spectrum and 21:9 pixel ratio as needed.
Nevertheless, the difference could lie in the more curved screen that ACER implies. Aside from that, ASUS incorporates an anti-flickering and revolutionary ROG light scheme to improve this performance. In general, let’s give a clap for the two devices. Though, the point will be given to ASUS for more improved imaging technology.
Refresh Rate
The refresh rate measured in hertz determines the times that an image will be displayed per second. This will also examine frames per second that the monitor will be able to display intuitively. As known, both devices possess a 60 Hz refresh rate with an overclocking up to 100 Hz. Nevertheless, there is really nothing different between the two devices. In general, let’s give this battle a draw indeed.
Durability and Design
Both devices are truly a gem with a futuristic and wide-screen design that truly enhances the sophistication of your rooms. ACER has a great curved widescreen with a strong aluminum base connected to it. Whereas, ASUS a bit curvy with an intuitive frameless design and titanium armor to enjoy strength and durability as needed. Thus, let’s give this point to ASUS.
Adaptive Technology
Consequently, both devices incorporate an NVIDIA G-Sync as their main adaptive technology. Thus, it is expected that there are no tearing and roadblocks with the seamless display as needed into its operation. Nevertheless, both devices have an ultra-wide IPS display making sure that the device keeps a vibrant image quality as needed. Let’s give this again a draw to both devices.
Connectors
This is essential to examine the compatibility and support of monitors as needed. Nevertheless, ASUS is quite more flexible than ACER with an integrated USB 3.0 cable. ACER only includes an HDMI and Display port consecutively. Thus, let’s give this parameter to ASUS again.
Response Time
Pixel response time is an important parameter to consider. It measures the amount of time a single pixel needs to switch from black to white or switch from different shades of grey. As to both devices, there is only a millisecond difference. ASUS is left behind with 5 ms grey to grey response time as compared to the latter with only 4 ms response time. Judging this, let’s give a point to ACER indeed.
Audio Capability
While a lot of users do not really care much about this feature upon utilization of external speakers, it is essential for efficient performance. Nevertheless, both devices include built-in speakers wire grille into the sides or atop the device. Both devices notably have decent speakers, not that loud with a low-frequency response. But nonetheless, ACER includes two 7-watt external speakers, into its package with DTS compatibility to it. This incorporation is quite intuitive as it should be. Thus, let’s give this solid point to ACER again.
Price
Both devices really have close prices. Though, it matters for most users who want to make sure that they’ll be given the best picture quality as needed. As Amazon serves as a standard reference, it is evident that Acer is about a hundred dollars cheaper than the ASUS gaming monitor. Knowing this, Acer will gain another point for its price.
Which One to Buy?
Upon examining specs and features, you should be more confused about what to purchase with two devices. Consequently, both devices have almost similar features that it’s really difficult to choose what is better than the other. As a recap, let’s review one from another.
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q gives you a greater imaging experience with innovative technology incorporated with it. The gaming monitor has been critically acclaimed winning the 2016 CES innovation award for its design and brilliant gaming performance. Aside from that, ASUS employs flexibility with a lot of add-ons and available ports for a more intuitive operation as it needs to be. Though the price seems more expensive than Acer, it’s entirely reasonable given the added features and technology that it incorporates. Overall, the device would be somehow useful for gamers who want more versatility and color quality not minding the price within it.
Acer Predator 34-inch Curved is a practical option for those gaming enthusiasts who want to experience astounding color and resolution at a convenient price. Nevertheless, the device has more improved sound quality than the latter. Though, it’s still decent for audio gaming. Also, it has an edge on refresh rate with only 1 ms than the former.
In general, there’s really nothing to complain about the device. It’s an excellent option, especially for those budget-savvy people.
Leave a Reply